collapse


18-Valve

  • Domestic Rider
  • Country: 00
  • Posts: 55
  • Liked: 28
  • Awards: 2016 Giro CQ game winner
Re: The 2014 CQ Ranking Manager Thread
« on: December 13, 2013, 09:59 »
No no, pretenders please apply! The field is getting smarter every year, and those of us with 3 years experience need to feel good by bettering someone, at least!

On a separate note, first 5 teams now from velorooms. And I love that whenever I've come by here in the last 2 days, all I see on the chat scrollbar is talk of CQ picks. Cyclingnews may get more traffic, but people feel like fans here.

Is there any evidence that 2013 had the smartest field? I'm genuinely curious, as it didn't look like it to me. There were probably too many picks that turned out to be weak or mediocre, also in the de-facto top teams. When you compare that to what was possible with unpopular picks such as Chris "tailwind" Froome and Richie Porte, I don't know.

I'd certainly welcome having a much bigger field, though, especially if (more) people from within pro cycling join. What do you all think are the best (least intrusive) ways to get more people to join?



  • ReplyReply

  •  

    Recent Posts

    Re: Man Down - Injury Reports 2017 by ciranda
    [Today at 15:19]


    Re: Stage 21 by t-72
    [Today at 12:23]


    Re: Tour of Belgium by DJW
    [Today at 12:12]


    Re: Tour of Belgium by Echoes
    [Today at 12:00]


    Re: Stig Broeckx Recovery Thread by Echoes
    [Today at 11:47]


    Re: Stage 21 by DJW
    [Today at 11:32]



    Top
    Back to top