Why? It was a good time trial bY Nibali but not special. (7th). I mean if he'd beaten Cancellara or finished close it would have been different. Horner and Kreuziger bombed today with both riders not even doing a top 40. Then the only logical conclusion is the strongest won.
But not because of beetroot juice.
I was joking, sorry I forgot to emphasize it with a smiley

But for some reason IMO Horner did not go as well as the last few days suggested he should've been able too. When i see Garzelli only lost 4 secs to Nibali and I reckon Horner can TT as well or not better than Garzelli. For example he only lost 3 secs to Velits in ToC last year over 15 miles whereas he lost 20 today over 6 miles.
I wonder was there more to it than meets the eye.